For nearly two decades, lawyers Jan and Jeffrey Rubinstein have been assisting their clients in matters of civil litigation. They are well established - in the 46th District Court, which handles most local arrests for drunk driving. DUI attorneys represent their clients, meaning they have years of experience with the judge.
This can prove invaluable in many OWI cases, as the law provides clear guidelines, but judges have a wide discretion and pursue their own judicial style and philosophy. If you believe you have the case, an experienced lawyer will tell you what is right and assist you to get the best possible result. This means protecting your rights, fighting for release or leniency, and helping you get back on the streets.
At Bingham Farms, we work with individuals and companies seeking legal representation in OWI cases. While the goals of each case vary according to your particular circumstances, you want us to help you leave it all behind.
If you are arrested for OWI in Southfield, MI, let us help protect your rights and interests. There are numerous defense tactics that can be effective in Southeastern Michigan DUI cases, depending on the individual circumstances of your case. These are just a few examples of defense options, and our leading DUI attorneys in Southfield will review all evidence to determine the best way to challenge them.
If you or a loved one were injured or killed by negligence from another, you may be able to recover certain damages to compensate for medical bills, funeral expenses, and more. An intentional act is negligence and both the defendant and the plaintiff must prove that the defendant intentionally intended to cause harm. If you need to claim damages in a contract dispute, you can be advised about your rights by a lawyer like Jan or Jeffrey Rubinstein. Call us at 248 - 220 - 1415 or use our online form to set up a consultation or contact us if you have any problems in your area.
While we can almost certainly say that most calls reporting impaired driving are still received by 911 (and most cell phones), it is clear that the department does not provide a reporting service for callers who leave their phone numbers, emails or text messages. Although Southfield's OWI arrests are based on tipsters, particularly anonymous ones, there is no guarantee they will beat the charges. If the police rely heavily on anonymous callers to initiate a traffic stop, it is possible to challenge all the evidence gathered afterwards. The evidence may be ripe for a challenge, and if you leave the caller your phone number, email address or other personal information, your department may not provide it to you.
It is therefore imperative that you have experienced consultants at your side, who simplify the process while aggressively fighting for your rights and interests.
The MCL 257.625 uses the term "narcotic" and not "driving under the influence," which is why it is considered a traffic offense in Michigan. When someone acts negligently, a person does not exercise due care in his or her actions, resulting in an injury that is not intentional but nonetheless serious. The damage can not only hurt your feelings, but also damage your reputation and cause serious damage to your family and friends.
If you are made redundant for reasons other than those to which you are entitled, you can have a basis for a case of discrimination in employment if you feel that this is the case. If you have signed a contract that you consider to be binding and the other party does not consider to be at the end of the contract, a dispute may arise. Several areas are covered by "workplace discrimination," including race, colour, religion, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status and disability.
First, the court argued that the fact that you call 911 does not increase your reliability because you are anonymous and technology is increasing, allowing police to identify the caller and prosecute him for false reporting. The ruling was not about whether a driver had a reasonable suspicion before stopping, but whether an officer had to have a 'reasonable suspicion' to stop a vehicle. It is clear that a call from an anonymous person to someone who has ever observed drunk drivers is sufficient to establish a reasonable suspicion.
Although the judiciary confirmed the conviction, it is important to take into account the totality of the circumstances. When officers stopped the truck and smelled marijuana, they reasonably suspected that he had found several large bags of narcotics during a search. He had no health problems that would have impaired his ability to drive and the police were right to stop him because he knew there was a potential danger to the public and because they had observed erratic driving when they finally caught up with him.